FDA Scientific Equipment Maintenance & Repair RFI

Amendment No. 0001 – Extension of Response Due Date

The Government is extending the response due date for the FDA Scientific Equipment Maintenance & Repair Request for Information (RFI), Notice ID HFP-2027-133969.

The response due date is changed from June 5, 2026, at 12:00 PM EDT to June 12, 2026, at 12:00 PM EDT.

This extension is intended to provide interested parties additional time to review the RFI and submit responses.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Original

1. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

This Request for Information (RFI) is issued for market research purposes only in accordance with RFO FAR 10. This notice does not constitute a solicitation, a request for proposal, or a commitment by the Government to issue a solicitation. No contract will be awarded from this RFI, and the Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this notice.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is conducting market research to better understand Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) policies, practices, technical capabilities, and contractual terms that may affect competition in the maintenance and repair of scientific equipment.

The Government seeks responses from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) that provide maintenance, repair, calibration, software support, and technical support services for scientific and laboratory equipment using primarily in-house or directly employed technicians.

The Government is particularly interested in understanding:

• The extent to which OEMs rely on in-house technicians versus authorized or third-party service providers;
• Whether OEM service models, technical controls, licensing requirements, or corporate policies restrict the Government’s ability to utilize Independent Service Organizations (ISOs), Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contractors, or other qualified third-party service providers;
• Access limitations involving parts, software, diagnostics, training, technical data, and firmware;
• Post-warranty service restrictions and support practices;
• Market conditions affecting competition for scientific equipment service and repair support;
• Opportunities to increase competition and support fair and reasonable pricing through the use of qualified non-OEM service providers where appropriate.

The majority of equipment covered under the relevant contract portfolio carries a standard 12-month warranty. The Government is therefore particularly interested in OEM service and support practices that apply during the post-warranty lifecycle of equipment, which may span 10 or more years.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONSE

Interested parties are requested to respond in writing to the questions set forth in Section 4 of this RFI. Responses should be submitted electronically to the point of contact identified no later than the response due date.

Please limit responses only to the questions related to this RFI. Do not submit capability statements, brochures, or exhibits.

No formal pricing is required; however, respondents may provide general pricing structures where applicable.

Please include the following information on the cover page of your response:

1. Company name, address, and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)
2. Point of contact name, title, telephone number, and email address
3. Business size and applicable socioeconomic status (if any)
4. NAICS code(s) applicable to your firm's services
5. Description of your organization’s service model, including the extent to which maintenance and repair services are performed by directly employed OEM technicians versus subcontracted or authorized service providers.

Responses will be used solely for market research and acquisition planning purposes. Proprietary information will be handled in accordance with applicable law. Respondents may designate portions of their response as proprietary; however, such designations should be limited to genuinely sensitive commercial information.

3. SCOPE OF INQUIRY

The Government is seeking information related to OEM policies, practices, support models, and contractual or technical restrictions that may affect competition and the Government’s ability to utilize qualified third-party service providers in the following areas:

1. Access to parts, components, and consumables required for maintenance and repair;
2. Availability of diagnostic software, firmware, and calibration tools;
3. Access to technical data, service documentation, and training;
4. Warranty terms and conditions affecting post-warranty service options;
5. Contractual or technical restrictions affecting Government or third-party servicing;
6. Availability and use of in-house OEM technicians versus subcontracted support;
7. Pre-inspection requirements for instruments not covered by a service agreement for six (6) months or longer;
8. Pricing and invoicing practices for maintenance and repair services.

Respondents are encouraged to address each question as specifically as possible with respect to their equipment product lines and service practices. Where policies differ across product lines, service regions, or equipment models, respondents should note those distinctions.

The Government’s objective is to better understand the extent to which qualified Independent Service Organizations (ISOs), Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contractors, and other third-party service providers may reasonably perform maintenance and repair services on OEM equipment in a manner that promotes competition, operational flexibility, and fair and reasonable pricing while maintaining equipment reliability, safety, and performance.

4. QUESTIONS FOR RESPONSE

A. Service Model and Technical Support Structure

1. Does your organization primarily perform maintenance and repair services using directly employed OEM technicians, subcontracted authorized service providers, or a combination of both?

2. Approximately what percentage of service calls are performed by:
• Direct employees/in-house technicians;
• Authorized subcontractors;
• Third-party field service providers?

3. Are Government customers permitted to utilize their own Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contractors to perform maintenance and repair on OEM equipment following expiration of the standard warranty period?

4. Are there any formal corporate policies, contractual provisions, licensing restrictions, or technical controls that limit non-OEM personnel from servicing your equipment? If so, please describe.

5. Does your organization require the use of OEM-employed technicians for any categories of maintenance, repair, calibration, software support, or firmware support activities? If so, identify those activities and explain the basis for the restriction.

B. Proprietary Parts and Components

1. Are replacement parts available for direct purchase by the Government or non-OEM service providers, or only through your authorized service network? If availability is restricted, please explain the basis for the restriction.

2. Are any parts, components, or consumables serialized or electronically paired to equipment in a manner that prevents substitution with functionally equivalent third-party parts? If so, please identify the categories of parts subject to such pairing and describe the technical mechanism used.

3. Do you supply parts to non-OEM service providers on the same pricing and availability terms as your own service organization? If not, please describe any differences in access, pricing, lead times, or minimum order requirements.

4. Are there any parts or components that remain restricted to your authorized service network after expiration of the standard warranty period? If so, please explain the basis for the continued restriction.

5. What is your parts availability commitment following end of production and end of sale for your equipment?

6. Can the Government procure and use commercially available replacement parts sourced from third-party suppliers (e.g., Grainger) instead of parts provided directly by the OEM, and are any components truly proprietary or restricted from third-party sourcing?

7. How would the use of non-OEM or independently sourced replacement parts affect the validity of the manufacturer’s warranty, service agreement, or contractor responsibility for equipment performance and repairs?

C. Software, Firmware, and Diagnostic Tools

1. Is OEM-proprietary diagnostic software or tooling required to perform routine maintenance, calibration, or repair of the equipment?

2. If OEM diagnostic software or tooling is required, is it available for purchase or license by the Government on commercially reasonable terms?

3. Will the OEM-provided diagnostic software grant the Government full access to all diagnostic, fault, and service codes, including hidden, proprietary, or manufacturer-level codes necessary to troubleshoot, maintain, and repair the equipment?

4. Does the equipment require OEM-issued firmware authentication tokens, remote authorization, or electronic unlocking to complete repair or recalibration activities? If so, please describe the process.

5. Are there software-enforced locks, alerts, or restrictions triggered by non-OEM service events that disable, degrade, or otherwise restrict equipment functionality? If so, please describe.

6. Are firmware updates and security patches available to Government users and non-OEM service providers, or are they conditioned on maintaining an active OEM service agreement?

7. Is there a cost associated with OEM software updates, patches, or upgrades, and for how long after equipment purchase or installation will such updates be provided?

8. Will the Government be notified when software updates, patches, or upgrades become available?

9. Will the Government’s Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contractor be authorized to install OEM-provided software updates, patches, and upgrades, or must such updates be performed exclusively by OEM or OEM-authorized personnel?

D. Technical Data and Documentation

1. Is the full service manual, including wiring diagrams, schematics, calibration procedures, and error code definitions, available to the Government and non-OEM service providers? If not, please identify what is withheld and the basis for any withholding.

2. Is any technical data necessary for routine maintenance or repair withheld under intellectual property, licensing, or trade secret claims? If so, please describe what is withheld and any alternative support mechanisms available.

3. Has technical documentation availability changed over the lifecycle of your products? For example, is documentation more restricted after a certain period post-sale or following product end-of-life designation?

E. Warranty Terms and Post-Warranty Service

1. Does your standard warranty contain terms that void coverage if maintenance or repair is performed by a non-OEM or non-authorized service provider? If so, please identify the applicable warranty provisions and describe their scope.

2. After the standard warranty period expires, are parts, documentation, diagnostic tools, and software available to the Government and non-OEM service providers without restriction? If restrictions persist beyond the warranty period, please identify them and explain the basis.

3. Do your standard service agreements or extended warranty offerings contain terms that would contractually restrict the Government from using ISOs or in-house Government technicians for maintenance and repair activities?

4. Are there ongoing licensing agreements, software subscriptions, or service plan terms that effectively require continued OEM service engagement to maintain full equipment functionality beyond the warranty period?

5. Should a sole awardee be selected for a future Government requirement, will the OEM permit the Government’s designated Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contractor to perform post-warranty service, maintenance, and repairs on OEM equipment, or are such services restricted exclusively to OEM-authorized service providers?

6. Are there any formal corporate policies, contractual requirements, licensing restrictions, technical controls, or OEM-imposed limitations—other than standard business development or sales practices—that restrict the Government or third-party service providers from performing maintenance, diagnostics, calibration, or repair activities on OEM equipment following expiration of the initial warranty period? If so, please describe the specific restrictions and their basis.

F. Training and Certification

1. Is OEM-provided training required—legally, contractually, or practically—to perform maintenance or repair on your equipment?

2. If training is required, is that training available to Government personnel and non-OEM service providers on commercially reasonable terms?

3. Do you operate an ISO certification or authorization program? If so, please describe:
• Certification criteria;
• Fees and prerequisites;
• Estimated certification timelines;
• Any restrictions affecting market participation.

4. Are there any categories of maintenance or repair tasks for which no training or certification pathway is available to non-OEM providers?

G. Pricing, Invoicing, and Service Agreements

1. Is your organization willing to offer service agreements with monthly or quarterly invoicing and payment terms instead of requiring full annual payment upfront?

2. Can service agreements be structured so payment is tied to services rendered and accepted by the Government in accordance with standard federal invoicing and acceptance procedures?

3. If upfront annual payment is required, what accommodations or alternatives can be offered to align with Government funding and payment constraints?

4. Can your organization provide a catalog or schedule of rates for repair services, including technician hourly labor rates, flat-rate service call charges, and any applicable equipment or machine hourly usage rates?

5. Are there pre-inspection requirements or reinstatement fees for instruments that have not maintained continuous service agreement coverage? If so, please describe.

H. Market Structure and Third-Party Access

1. Do you maintain exclusive arrangements with any service providers that restrict non-OEM service providers from obtaining parts, diagnostic tools, technical documentation, training, or software support for your equipment?

2. Has your organization ever taken legal, technical, or contractual action to prevent or restrict third-party servicing of your equipment? If so, please describe the circumstances and outcome.

3. Are there geographic, volume, or market-segment limitations on non-OEM service provider access to your service support infrastructure?

4. Respondents are encouraged to identify any additional policies, practices, technical mechanisms, or contractual requirements not specifically addressed above that may limit the ability of the Government or third parties to perform maintenance and repair activities.

5. DISCLAIMER

This RFI is issued solely for information and market research planning purposes. It does not constitute a solicitation and shall not be construed as a commitment by the Government to issue a solicitation or ultimately award a contract.

Responses to this RFI are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. The Government is not obligated to acknowledge receipt of or provide feedback regarding any responses submitted.

All information provided in response to this RFI is voluntary. Failure to respond will not affect any future competitive standing. Respondents assume all costs associated with preparation and submission of their responses.